Lilly et al v. GEICO Indemnity Company
| Donald Lilly and Charlotte Lilly |
| GEICO Indemnity Company |
| 4:2014cv00010 |
| January 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Middle Office |
| Marshall |
| Robert B Propst |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 4 Motion to Dismiss and 6 Motion for Summary Judgment- As to the bad faith refusal to pay claim in Count II- the claim is due to be dismissed; the court DISMISSES the bad faith failure to pay claim in Count II WITH OUT PREJUDICE; As to the breach of contract claim asserted in Count I- the court addresses it as a motion for dismissal and DENIES the motion to dismiss as to the breach of contract claim at this time, WITHOUT PREJUDICE to revisiting that issue at a later stage; As for the bad faith claim in Count II, the court DEEMS the motion for summary judgment to be MOOT, as the court has dismissed that claim. As to the claims in Count I, the court DENIES the motion WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This case will proceed with the claims of breach of contract in Count I and, to the extent, if any, that they are separate, the claims for UIM benefits in Count III. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 9/29/14. (SAC )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
