Pickens v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
| Travis Sentel Pickens |
| Alabama Department of Corrections, John Hutton and Johnson |
| 4:2016cv01854 |
| November 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Middle Office |
| St. Clair |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Harwell G Davis |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER Magistrate Judge Davis' report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. The court ORDERS that all claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections; all official-capacity claims against defendants Hutton and Johnson; the Ei ghth Amendment excessive force claims against defendant Hutton for the plaintiffs July 21, 2016, assault; and the Eighth Amendment excessive force and Fourteenth Amendment due process claims against defendants Hutton and Johnson arising from the plai ntiff's August 18, 2016, assault are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The court further ORDERS that the Eighth Amendment medical care and conditions of confinement claims against defendant Hutton, and Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant Johnson for the plaintiffs July 21, 2016, assault are REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Herman N. Johnson, Jr., for further proceedings. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 6/29/2017. (PSM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
