Ruggieri v. City of Hoover, The et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Todd Ruggieri
Defendant: City of Hoover, The, Melinda James Lopez and Mesha Dacus
Case Number: 4:2018cv00476
Filed: March 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Middle Office
County: St. Clair
Presiding Judge: Karon O Bowdre
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 74 MEMORANDUM OPINION: Summary Judgment is due to be GRANTED as to Ruggierie's ADA claim; is MOOT as it relates to its counterclaim; For the foregoing reasons, Ruggieri's Motion Requesting Default Judgment and Complete Dismissal of the City of Hoovers Counterclaim is DENIED; Ruggieri's Motion for Summary Judgment based upon Defense/Defendant Misconduct is DENIED; the City's motion to strike Ruggieri's Motion for Summary Judgment based upon Defense/Defendant Misconduct is DE NIED AS MOOT; the City's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as it relates to Ruggieri's ADA claim and DENIED AS MOOT as it relates to the City's counterclaim; this case is due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as more fully set out therein. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 3/12/2020. (AHI)
May 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 05/03/19. (SPT )
July 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE 7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Mesha Dacus, Melinda James Lopez AND 6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Hoover, The. The Court ORDERS the following: The Citys motion to dismiss Mr. Ruggieris ADA claim is DENIED; Mr. Ruggieris HIPAA claim against the City is DISMISSED; Mr. Ruggieris ADA and HIPAA claims against Ms. Dacus and Ms. Lopez are DISMISSED; Mr. Ruggieri is granted 14 days to amend his Complaint, if he so chooses;The Citys deadline to answer the Complaint is 20 days from the date of this Order, or 20 days from the date Mr. Ruggieri files an Amended Complaint (if he does so), whichever is later. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 7/24/2018. (KWC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruggieri v. City of Hoover, The et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Todd Ruggieri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Hoover, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melinda James Lopez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mesha Dacus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?