Brasher v. Allstate Indemnity Company
| Donald Brasher |
| Allstate Indemnity Company |
| 4:2018cv00576 |
| April 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Middle Office |
| St. Clair |
| Virginia Emerson Hopkins |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons stated above, the court DENIES Mr. Brasher's motion for reconsideration and motion to re-open discovery. (Doc. 126 ). Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 11/24/2020. (MEB2)
|
|
Filing
123
REDACTED 122 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons stated above, the court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Allstate's motion to exclude the opinion testimony of Mr. Hatcher and Mr. Wells. (Doc. 75 ). The court DENIES as MOOT Mr. Br asher's motion to exclude to the opinion testimony of Mr. Odom. (Doc. 78 ). The court DENIES as MOOT Mr. Brasher's motion to exclude Mr. Roberts' opinions, to the extent Mr. Brasher challenges the cited portions of her testimony (Doc. 79 ). The court DENIES as MOOT Allstate's motion to exclude paragraphs 6 and 7 of Colby Graff's declaration. (Doc. 72 ). The court DENIES Mr. Brasher's motion to strike paragraphs 9, 10, 11, and 13 of Mr. Odom's declaration. (Doc. 82 ). And the court DENIES Mr. Brasher's motion for class certification. (Doc. 64 ). Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 8/12/2020. (KEK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
