Archer v. Estes et al
Plaintiff: Mark David Archer
Defendant: Cedric Specks, Cookie Graham, Dewayne Estes and Kevin White
Case Number: 4:2018cv01368
Filed: August 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Referring Judge: Virginia Emerson Hopkins
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE- Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause in writing and under oath within fifteen (15) days why the court should not dismiss this action for failure to prosecute. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITHIN THE TIME PRESCRIBED WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 10/17/2018. (cm to pla)(KWC)
October 1, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of signed Prisoner Consent Form by Mark David Archer re #4 Order; (Attachment: #1 letter)(KWC)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 ; plaintiff is required to pay a partial filing fee, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 9/6/2018. (KWC)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re #1 Complaint filed by Mark David Archer - The plaintiff must sign and return to the Clerk the attached copy of the complaint within thirty (30) days. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITHIN THE TIME PRESCRIBED MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on the plaintiff, along with a copy of the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 9/6/2018. (KWC)
August 27, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION (Declaration) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mark David Archer. (KWC)
August 27, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with affidavit against Dewayne Estes, Cookie Graham, Cedric Specks, and Kevin White, filed by Mark David Archer.(KWC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Archer v. Estes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark David Archer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cedric Specks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cookie Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dewayne Estes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?