Stanley v. Nielsen
| Sanchu Stanley |
| Kristen Nielsen, Attorney General Jefferson B Sessions, III, David Rivera and Scott . Hassell |
| 4:2018cv01518 |
| September 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to re #5 filed by Sanchu Stanley. (TLM, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL Based on the foregoing, the court finds that this action is duplicative of 18-00031. The petitioner's motion to submit documents in support of the present petition #3 and request that the court consolidate his 2241 petitions ( #4 at 3) are DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 10/18/2018. (PSM)
|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to 9/21/2018 Order re #2 filed by Sanchu Stanley. (TLM, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to add documents to petitioners civil action by Sanchu Stanley. (TLM, ) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing within fourteen (14) days why this action should not be dismissed as duplicative of Case No. 18-00031. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 9/21/2018. (PSM)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.) B4601092060, filed by Sanchu Stanley.(TLM, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
