Salmon v. Entrekin et al
| Kirstjen Nielsen |
| Mark Anthony Salmon |
| Todd Entrekin and Scott Hassell |
| 4:2018cv01978 |
| November 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Karon O Bowdre |
| John H England |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Lift Stay by Kirstjen Nielsen. (Marshall, Mary) |
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion to Stay due to lapse in appropriations as outlined in Respondents' motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H. England, III on 12/26/218. (CLS2)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Stay by Kirstjen Nielsen. (Marshall, Mary) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Lester Marshall on behalf of Kirstjen Nielsen (Marshall, Mary) |
|
Filing 2
SHOW CAUSE ORDER - Petitioner Mark Anthony Salmon has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. (Doc. 1). Petitioner is presently confined in Etowah County Detention Center. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Respondent appear and show cause in writing within thirty (30) days, why the relief requested by Petitioner should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 12/3/2018. (KEK)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5.00 receipt #B4601093785), filed by Mark Anthony Salmon.(JLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
