Parish v. HomeLodge et al
Randy Scott Parish |
Vishal Patel, HomeLodge and Vishal Patel an individual, d/b/a HomeLodge |
4:2018cv02119 |
December 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Annemarie Carney Axon |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re #4 First MOTION to Dismiss Amended w/Redactions filed by Vishal Patel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1-3)(Fields, J) |
|
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #4 First MOTION to Dismiss filed by Vishal Patel. (Attachments: #1 Ex 1-3)(Fields, J) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 First MOTION to Dismiss filed by Randy Scott Parish. (Beeman, Robert) |
|
Filing 4 First MOTION to Dismiss by HomeLodge, Vishal Patel. (Fields, J) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Randy Scott Parish. HomeLodge served on 1/4/2019, answer due 1/25/2019; Vishal Patel served on 1/4/2019, answer due 1/25/2019. (KAM) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to HomeLodge, Vishal Patel. mailed certified mail (TLM, ) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3245545. related document #1 COMPLAINT against HomeLodge, Vishal Patel, filed by Randy Scott Parish.(KEK). (Beeman, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HomeLodge, Vishal Patel, filed by Randy Scott Parish.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.