Brown v. Rivera et al
Petitioner: Ricardo Hugh Brown
Respondent: Matthew Whitaker, Scott Hassell, David Rivera and Kirstjen Nielsen
Case Number: 4:2019cv00020
Filed: January 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Herman N Johnson
Referring Judge: Abdul K Kallon
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2019 Filing 7 Opposition to re #4 Report and Recommendation filed by Ricardo Hugh Brown. (AFS)
February 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER the magistrate judge's report is ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly the court ORDERS that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as PREMATURE. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 2/5/2019. (AFS)
January 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER the court GRANTS the motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 , but DENIES the motion for appointment of counsel #3 WITHOUT PREJUDICE because, as set out in the report and recommendation entered contemporaneously herewith, Brown's petition for writ of habeas corpus is due to be denied as premature. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 1/14/2019. (AFS)
January 14, 2019 Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the court DISMISS the habeas corpus petition WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature. Petitioner may file specific written objections to this report and recommendation within 14 calendar days from the date the report and recommendation is entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 1/14/2019. (AFS)
January 4, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Ricardo Hugh Brown. (KEK)
January 4, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ricardo Hugh Brown. (KEK)
January 4, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ricardo Hugh Brown.(KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Rivera et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew Whitaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Hassell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Rivera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kirstjen Nielsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ricardo Hugh Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?