Treasure v. Horton
Kirstjen Nielsen |
Orane Alfanso Treasure |
Johnathon Horton |
4:2019cv00110 |
January 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
John H England |
R David Proctor |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER This case is before the court on Respondent's Motion for Extension. #7 . For good cause shown, the Motion #7 is GRANTED. On or before March 23, 2019, Respondent SHALL file a response to the Order to Show Cause. #5 . Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/22/2019. (KAM) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time by Kirstjen Nielsen. (Marshall, Mary) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Lester Marshall on behalf of Kirstjen Nielsen (Marshall, Mary) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The respondent shall appear and show cause in writing within 30 days why the relief requested should not be granted. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 1/23/2019. (KAM) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 1/23/2019. (KAM) |
Filing 3 MOTION Application for Issuance of Order to Show Cause by Orane Alfanso Treasure. (KAM) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Orane Alfanso Treasure. (KAM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Orane Alfanso Treasure.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.