Jones v. Jones et al
Justin Devonterrious Jones |
Karla Jones and Cynthia Stewart |
4:2019cv00632 |
April 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
John E Ott |
R David Proctor |
Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay a partial filing fee of $12.83, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days, Motions terminated: #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Justin Devonterrious Jones, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Justin Devonterrious Jones. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 6/18/2019. (KAM) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Justin Devonterrious Jones. (KAM) |
Filing 3 ORDER NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING - the plaintiff must file a verified application to proceed ifp within 30 dasy. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 5/10/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP application)(KAM) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Justin Devonterrious Jones. (KAM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Karla Jones, Cynthia Stewart, filed by Justin Devonterrious Jones.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.