Byner v. Dunn et al
| Dionntez Byner |
| Jeff Dunn, Marshall, Myers, Bryant and Simmons |
| 4:2019cv00643 |
| April 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| T Michael Putnam |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER transferring case to another district: ORDER transferring case to the Middle District of Alabama; original electronic record and certified copy of docket entries will be emailed to Clerk of Court 10 business days from this date. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 6/7/2019. (PSM)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION For the reasons within, the magistrate judge RECOMMENDS that this action be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. The magistrate judge further RECOMMENDS that the plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 be left pending for resolution by the transferee court. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 5/7/2019. (PSM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis w/ attachments by Dionntez Byner. (KWC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bryant, Jeff Dunn, Marshall, Myers, Simmons, filed by Dionntez Byner.(KWC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
