Austin v. Estes et al
| Charles M Austin |
| Specks, I-I Investigation, Estes and Gordy |
| 4:2019cv01972 |
| December 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John H England |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing fee: $ 2.00, receipt number B4601103496. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 4
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Charles M Austin. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date the Report and Recommendation is entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 1/17/2020. (JLC)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER - The plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by certified copies of his prison account statements. (Doc. #2 ). The application is GRANTED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b). The plaintiff is ORDERED to pay an initial partial filing fee of $1.67 in order to commence this action, and thereafter to make monthly installment payments toward payment of the full filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 12/9/2019. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles M Austin. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Estes, Gordy, I-I Investigation, Specks, filed by Charles M Austin.(KEK)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
