Poole v. Devine et al
| LaShawn Murrell Poole |
| R. Jones, Alex Burgess, John Key, Daniel Sims, Steve Ray Aldorholt and A. Devine |
| 4:2020cv00117 |
| January 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John E Ott |
| R David Proctor |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER the plaintiff is ordered to pay the initial partial filing fee of $1.62 within 14 days; failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 3/3/2020. (KAM)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by LaShawn Murrell Poole (KAM) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER CONSENT FORM by LaShawn Murrell Poole (KAM) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay a partial filing fee of $1.62, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 1/23/2020. (KAM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by LaShawn Murrell Poole. (JLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Steve Ray Aldorholt, Alex Burgess, A. Devine, R. Jones, John Key, Daniel Sims, filed by LaShawn Murrell Poole.(JLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
