Brown v. Warden of Etowah County Detention Center et al
| Daniel Brown |
| Department of Homeland Security and Warden of Etowah County Detention Center |
| 4:2020cv01073 |
| July 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Liles C Burke |
| Herman N Johnson |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court concludes the Magistrate Judge's R&R should be ACCEPTED and ADPOTS the findings of the Court; this action is therefore DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 9/2/2020. (AHI)
|
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The magistrate juddge RECOMMENDS the court DISMISS this action as duplicative; objections due within 14 days from the entry date of this R&R. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 8/7/2020. (AHI) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Submit Affidavit Regarding ICE Procedures in Making Decision to Detain Petitioner by Daniel Brown. (AHI) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Expedite Consideration of 2241, TRO and/or Emergency Hearing Based upon COVID-19 Pandemic by Daniel Brown. (AHI) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Daniel Brown. (AHI) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number: B4601107417) filed by Daniel Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(AHI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
