Mendez Diaz v. Barr et al
| Yusiel Mendez Diaz |
| Warden of Immigration Detention Facility, Daniel Biblia, Luis Lopez, Chad Wolf, William Barr and Monty Wilkinson |
| 4:2021cv00057 |
| January 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Middle Office |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER - The respondents have filed a second motion for extension of time to file a response to the Order to Show Cause. (Doc. #13 ). For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. The respondents SHALL respond to the show cause order by March 24, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 3/11/2021. (KEK)
|
| Filing 13 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to file Response to Order to Show Cause by Daniel Biblia, Luis Lopez, Monty Wilkinson, Chad Wolf. (Pickren, Robert) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER - The respondents have filed a motion for extension of time to file a response to the Order to Show Cause. (Doc. #11 ). For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. The respondents SHALL respond to the Order to Show Cause by March 10, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 2/8/2021. (KEK)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to file Response to Order to Show Cause by William Barr, Daniel Biblia, Luis Lopez, Chad Wolf. (Pickren, Robert) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Cooper Pickren on behalf of William Barr, Daniel Biblia, Luis Lopez, Chad Wolf (Pickren, Robert) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that the respondents appear and show cause in writing within twenty (20) days from the entry date of this Order, why the relief requested by the petitioner should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 1/19/2021. (KEK)
|
| Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Texas Southern; Case Number 1:20-cv-00166. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 7
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: #4 Report and Recommendations. As a result, the District Clerk's Office is ORDERED to transfer the present case to the United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama, Middle Division pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1631 and 28 U.S.C. 2241(b). (Signed by Judge Rolando Olvera) Parties notified.(jtabares, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 1/14/2021.]
|
| Interdistrict transfer to Northern District of Alabama, Middle Division. Case transferred electronically, filed. (jtabares, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 1/14/2021.] |
| Filing 6 Certified Mail Receipt Returned re: 3 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (EdnitaPonce, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 1/14/2021.] |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Objections to R&R due by 10/30/2020(Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(jtabares, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 1/14/2021.] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (mperez, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 1/14/2021.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Yusiel Mendez Diaz.(mperez, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 1/14/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
