Smith v. Credence Resource Management LLC
| Meeka Smith |
| Credence Resource Management LLC |
| 4:2021cv00066 |
| January 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Corey L Maze |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Credence Resource Management LLC. filed by Credence Resource Management LLC (Nettles, Laura) |
| Filing 10 Credence Resource Management, LLC ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Credence Resource Management LLC.(Nettles, Laura) |
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER The Court hereby GRANTS #7 Defendant's motion for extension of time to file a response to Plaintiff's complaint. The deadline to file a response is now March 5, 2021. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 2/22/2021. (SRD)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Credence Resource Management LLC re #1 Complaint Proposed Order (Nettles, Laura) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Credence Resource Management LLC. (Nettles, Laura) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Meeka Smith. Credence Resource Management LLC served on 1/29/2021, answer due 2/19/2021. (MEB2) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Credence Resource Management LLC. Mailed certified mail. (MEB2) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradford W Botes on behalf of Meeka Smith (Botes, Bradford) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Meeka Smith. (Attachments: #1 Consent of Local Counsel) (SRD) |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Meeka Smith. (SRD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Credence Resource Management LLC, filed by Meeka Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (SRD) |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3755053 (B4601110853). (Philipps, David) Modified on 1/19/2021 (MEB2). |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3755057 (B4601110854). (Philipps, David) Modified on 1/19/2021 (MEB2). |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3755048 (B4601110852). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Credence Resource Management LLC, filed by Meeka Smith. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C) (SRD). (Philipps, David) Modified on 1/19/2021 (MEB2). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Credence Resource Management LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Credence Resource Management LLC | |
| Represented By: | Laura Catherine Nettles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Meeka Smith | |
| Represented By: | Bradford W Botes |
| Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
| Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
