Rivas et al v. PowerGrid Services LLC
| Emilio Gustavo Rivas and Richard Perez Rodriguez |
| PowerGrid Services LLC |
| 4:2021cv00993 |
| July 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER governing further proceedings in this action unless modified for good cause shown: Discovery due by 7/25/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 10/3/2022; Joint Status Report due by 6/24/2022. The parties shall be ready for trial in May 2023, to be scheduled by separate order. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 9/1/21. (SAC)
|
| Filing 5 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Ash, C) |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 8/12/21. (SAC)
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by PowerGrid Services LLC.(Ash, C) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to PowerGrid Services LLC. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (KEK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PowerGrid Services LLC, filed by Richard Perez Rodriguez, Emilio Gustavo Rivas.(KEK) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3887723. related document #1 COMPLAINT against PowerGrid Services LLC, filed by Richard Perez Rodriguez, Emilio Gustavo Rivas.(KEK). (Cole, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
