Talley v. Murray et al
| Benjamin Talley |
| Bill J Murray, Paul Monk and QCHC Inc |
| 4:2022cv00536 |
| April 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Corey L Maze |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on Paul Monk on 6/13/2022, filed by Benjamin Talley. (Fonteneau, Kira) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on Bill J. Murray on 5/27/2022, filed by Benjamin Talley. (Fonteneau, Kira) |
| Filing 5 RETURN of Service for Complaint and Summons served on QCHC, Inc. on 5/26/2022, filed by Benjamin Talley. (Fonteneau, Kira) Modified on 5/31/2022 (KEK). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Paul Monk, Bill J Murray, QCHC Inc. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (KEK) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4090775 (ALND B4601120382) related document #1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Benjamin Talley.(SRD). (Fonteneau, Kira) Modified on 5/23/2022 (KEK). |
| Filing 3 CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Benjamin Talley (SRD) |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Benjamin Talley. (SRD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Benjamin Talley.(SRD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
