Bowman v. Etowah County Community Punishment and Corrections Authority
Dominique Bowman |
Etowah County Community Punishment and Corrections Authority |
4:2022cv01264 |
September 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
R David Proctor |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER - Before the court is the Parties Joint Motion to Temporarily Stay Discovery and Rule 26 Obligations #6 . The Motion #6 is GRANTED. Discovery and Rule 26 obligations are STAYED until the court has ruled on Defendants Motion to Dismiss #2 . The parties will have thirty days from the date that Defendants Motion to Dismiss #2 is decided to submit a Rule 26(f) report to the court. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/28/2022. (KAM) |
Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Stay DISCOVERY AND RULE 26 OBLIGATIONS PENDING RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Etowah County Community Punishment and Corrections Authority. (Chynoweth, Brad) |
Filing 5 REPLY to Response to Motion re #2 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Etowah County Community Punishment and Corrections Authority. (Chynoweth, Brad) |
Filing 4 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Dominique Bowman. (Newton, Richard) |
Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/11/2022. (KAM) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4186425. related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Etowah County Community Punishment and Corrections Authority from Etowah County Circuit Court, case number 22-77., filed by Etowah County Community Punishment and Corrections Authority. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(KAM). (Chynoweth, Brad) NDAL rec# B1569 Modified on 10/11/2022 (KAM). |
Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss by Etowah County Community Punishment and Corrections Authority. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiffs April 11, 2022 affidavit and cover letter)(Chynoweth, Brad) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Etowah County Community Punishment and Corrections Authority from Etowah County Circuit Court, case number 22-77., filed by Etowah County Community Punishment and Corrections Authority. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bowman v. Etowah County Community Punishment and Corrections Authority | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dominique Bowman | |
Represented By: | Richard R Newton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Etowah County Community Punishment and Corrections Authority | |
Represented By: | Brad A. Chynoweth |
Represented By: | Steve Marshall |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.