Woodall v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation
| David Woodall |
| Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation |
| Byrd Maintenance Services, Inc. |
| 4:2022cv01357 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| R David Proctor |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: certain time limits apply as set out in this order; Discovery due by 10/6/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 11/3/2023. Mediation in October 2023, Pretrial conference ready in March 2024; Jury trial ready in April 2024. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 12/20/2022. (KAM)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge R David Proctor: Scheduling Conference held on 12/20/2022. A separate Scheduling Order will be entered by the court. (KLL)
|
|
Filing 11
Intervenor COMPLAINT Complaint by Intervenor Byrd Maintenance Services, Inc., filed by Byrd Maintenance Services, Inc..(Garcia, Britni)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER for the reasons discussed in the corresponding memorandum opinion, #5 Motion to Intervene is GRANTED. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 12/15/2022. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 12/15/2022. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Scheduling Conference set for 12/20/2022 10:30 AM before Judge R David Proctor. The conference will be held by telephone. Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendants are DIRECTED to dial-in to the conference by calling 866-434-5269 at the scheduled time. The access code is 6022965. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 12/13/2022. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 7
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Zorn, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER This matter is before the court on Byrd Maintenance Services, Inc.s Motion to Intervene #5 . The parties are REMINDED to brief the Motion in accordance with Exhibit B to the courts Initial Order. (Doc. # 3). Additionally, the parties are REMINDED of the courts motion practice procedures outlined in the Initial Order. The parties are DIRECTED to adhere to these guidelines when filing any future non-dispositive motions. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 11/22/2022. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Intervene by Byrd Maintenance Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Motion to Intervene)(Garcia, Britni)
|
|
Filing 4
ANSWER to Complaint Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation's Answer by Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation.(Mathis, Alan)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/26/2022. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation. filed by Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation (Mathis, Alan)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation from Marshall County Circuit Court, case number 22-900257., filed by Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(KAM)
|
|
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4196699. related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation from Marshall County Circuit Court, case number 22-900257., filed by Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(KAM). (Mathis, Alan) NDAL rec#B-195 Modified on 10/25/2022 (KAM).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
