Reeves v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff: Christopher Reeves
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Case Number: 4:2023cv01311
Filed: October 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: R David Proctor
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 TEXT ORDER - Before the court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. #14 . The Motion #14 is GRANTED IN PART. On or before January 5, 2024, Defendant SHALL file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 12/6/2023. (KAM)
December 1, 2023 Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Social Security Administration, Commissioner. (Holzberger, Malia)
December 1, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Malia Lawson Holzberger on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner (Holzberger, Malia)
October 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 TEXT ORDER - This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Christopher Reevess Amended Motion to Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. #11 . The court finds that Plaintiff is indigent, and the Motion #11 is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file this action without prepayment of a fee. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/24/2023. (KAM)
October 24, 2023 Filing 11 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Reeves. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit IFP Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Affidavit, #3 Exhibit SSA Form 5666, #4 Exhibit Special Education Services Notice, #5 Exhibit Scott Opinion, #6 Exhibit Nichols Opinion)(Bailey, Jason)
October 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TEXT ORDER - Before the court is Defendant's Motion for Substitution of Counsel #8 , requesting that the court allow attorney Arthurice Brundidge to substitute as counsel for Defendant in place of attorney Sarah Choi. The Motion #8 is GRANTED. Attorney Sarah Choi is hereby TERMINATED. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/16/2023. (KAM)
October 16, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Arthurice Brundidge on behalf of All Defendants (Brundidge, Arthurice)
October 16, 2023 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION to Substitute Attorney Attorney Arthurice Brundidge for Sarah Choi by Social Security Administration, Commissioner. (Brundidge, Arthurice)
October 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 TEXT ORDER - This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Christopher Reeves's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Amend and Explain IFP Motion. #6 . The Motion #6 is GRANTED. Plaintiff SHALL file his amended affidavit on or before Tuesday, October 24, 2023. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/13/2023. (KAM)
October 13, 2023 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to amend and explain IFP Motion by Christopher Reeves. (Bailey, Jason)
October 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Christopher Reeves's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP"). (Doc. # 2). In support of the Motion, Plaintiff attached an affidavit filled out by his wife, Abbey Lachelle Reeves. Because the affidavit was neither filled out nor signed by Plaintiff, and it provides no explanation as to why that is so. Plaintiffs Motion (Doc. # 2) is DENIED. On or before Tuesday, October 17, 2023, Plaintiff is ORDERED to either pay the filing fee or present an amended affidavit showing he is entitled to proceed IFP. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/10/2023. (KAM)
October 5, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jack B Hood on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner (Hood, Jack)
October 3, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Choi on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner (Choi, Sarah)
October 3, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Reeves. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit IFP Affidavit)(Bailey, Jason)
October 2, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, Commissioner, filed by Christopher Reeves.(KAM)
October 2, 2023 NOTICE that counsel is required to provide the social security of the plaintiff to the US Attorney's Office within 10 days. This notice is to be made outside of the electronic filing system. (KAM)
October 2, 2023 Social Security Answer Deadline by Christopher Reeves. Social Security Administration, Commissioner served on 10/2/2023, answer due 12/1/2023. (KAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reeves v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Reeves
Represented By: Jason P. Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Represented By: Arthurice Brundidge
Represented By: Jack B Hood
Represented By: Sarah Elizabeth Choi
Represented By: Malia Lawson Holzberger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?