Abbott Point of Care Inc. v. Epocal, Inc.
||Abbott Point of Care Inc.
||March 28, 2008
||US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
||XX US, Outside State
||C Lynwood Smith
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
||28:1331 Fed. Question
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 5, 2012
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that it is ORDERED that Epocal is Awarded costs in the amount of $166,680.40; the clerk of the court is directed to tax costs in this amount as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 11/5/2012. (AHI)
|April 18, 2012
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER that Epocal's motion to exclude evidence and argument that Abbott has been harmed by Epocal's alleged conduct is GRANTED inpart and DENIED in part, Epocal's motion to exclude evidence and argument regarding its FDA 510(k) submissions is GRANTED, Epocal's motion to exclude documents that use certain claim terms outside the context of the patents-in-suit is DENIED, Epocal's motion to exclude arguments and evidence regarding solicitation of empl oyees other than the five at issue in Abbott's tortious interference allegations is DENIED, Epocal should present this court and opposing counsel a draft of a proposed limiting instruction by 4/20/2012, objections no later than 4/23/2012; as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 4/18/2012. (AHI)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?