Petty v. United Plating, Inc.

Plaintiff: Shelby Petty
Defendant: United Plating, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2009cv01465
Filed: July 22, 2009
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: C Lynwood Smith
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 31, 2012 38 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE that the defendant's motion to strike portions of plaintiff's declaration is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, Defendant's motion to strike the unsworn statements is GRANTED, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and all claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; as more fully set out in order, costs are taxed to plaintiff. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 5/31/2012. (AHI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Petty v. United Plating, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelby Petty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Plating, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?