Biggerstaff v. Constable et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 12, 2012
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Re: Motions for Summary Judgment ( 18 -Officer Constable and the City, 21 -Wal-Mart and Mulak, and 33 -Payne): As further set out in order, this court GRANTS Officer Constable and the City's motion for summary jud gment and GRANTS summary judgment for Mulack and for Wal-Mart on all claims based on alleged conduct by Mulack. As it relates to Payne, the court GRANTS Payne's motion for the false arrest and false imprisonment claim and GRANTS Wal-Mart's motion on this claim as well. Finally, the court GRANTS Wal-Mart's motion on the negligent hiring, training, and supervision claim. In all other respects, the motions for summary judgment are DENIED. Therefore, the claims remaining for trial are the negligence claim against Payne and the assault and battery claim against Payne and Wal-Mart. 14 , MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Will Payne is DENIED. 29 , MOTION to Compel is DENIED. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 07/12/12. (CVA)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?