Crockett v. Maximus Inc

Plaintiff: Gary Crockett
Defendant: Maximus Inc
Case Number: 5:2011cv01657
Filed: May 19, 2011
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: T Michael Putnam
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 14, 2012 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the court adopts and approves the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court and it is ORDERED that all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice; costs are taxed as paid; as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 6/14/2012. (AHI )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crockett v. Maximus Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maximus Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Crockett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?