Agility Defense & Government Services, Inc et al v. U.S. Department of Defense et al
| Agility Defense & Government Services, Inc and Agility International, Inc. |
| U.S. Department of Defense, Leon E. Panetta, Defense Logistics Agency and Alan Thompson |
| 5:2011cv04111 |
| December 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Northeastern Office |
| Madison |
| C Lynwood Smith |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE that plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED, it is DECLARED that defendants' suspension of plaintiffs for greater than 18 m onths, without the initiation of legal proceedings against plaintiffs, is contrary to law, additionally, it is DECLARED that plaintiffs are eligible for government contracts, provided they are determined to meet the responsibility requirements of 48 C.F.R. § 9.103; it is further ORDERED that defendants lift plaintiffs' suspension from government contracting, and remove them from the Excluded Parties List; as more fully set out in order; costs are taxed to defendants. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 6/26/2012. (AHI)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
