Coppett v. Tennessee Valley Authority et al
| Johnny Coppett |
| Mike Duncan, Tom Gilliland, William Graves, Barbara S. Haskew, Richard Howorth, Neil McBride, William B. Sansom, Marilyn A. Brown, Dennis Bottorff, Tennessee Valley Authority and Tom Kilgore |
| 5:2011cv04227 |
| December 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Northeastern Office |
| Limestone |
| C Lynwood Smith |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0794 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE that the defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and all of plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice, costs are taxed to plaintiff as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 12/16/2013. (AHI )
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that defendant's motion for partial judgment onthe pleadings is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and it is ORDERED that thefollowing claims are DISMISSED with prejudice: (1) plaintiff's Rehabilitation Act clai ms based on the 2003 failure to promote and the 2006 demotion; (2) plaintiff's claim for outrage (Count Three of his complaint); and (3) all claims against defendants Tennessee Valley Authority and Tom Kilgore; the parties are directed to proceed to discovery on all remaining claims; as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 9/11/2012. (AHI, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
