Madison County Communications District v. Centurylink, Inc.

Plaintiff: Madison County Communications District
Defendant: Centurylink, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2012cv01768
Filed: May 3, 2012
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: Inge P Johnson
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 20, 2012 57 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Inge P Johnson on 12/20/12. (ASL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Madison County Communications District v. Centurylink, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Madison County Communications District
Represented By: Gregory B Breedlove
Represented By: W Percy Badham, III
Represented By: Brannon J Buck
Represented By: Richard T Dorman
Represented By: Brett Andrew Ialacci
Represented By: Steven L Nicholas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Centurylink, Inc.
Represented By: Kevin R Garrison
Represented By: Misty Smith Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?