Kim v. Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University
Plaintiff: Jeongah Kim
Defendant: Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University
Case Number: 5:2012cv02190
Filed: June 15, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: T Michael Putnam
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 9/24/2014. (MSN)
April 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by US Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 4/29/2013. (KAM, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kim v. Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeongah Kim
Represented By: Henry L Penick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?