Huntsville Golf Development, Inc. v. Estate of Robert Brindley, Sr. et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 14, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the reasons stated above, the Court grants the defendants motion for summary judgment on HGDs claims for breach of contract, fraud and deceit, and conspiracy. (Doc. 124).9 The Court also grants HGDs motion for summary judgment on the Estates counterclaim for breach of contract. (Doc. 127). The Court will enter a separate order consistent with this memorandum opinion. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 9/14/2017. (KEK)
|December 16, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff Huntsville Golf Development, Inc. (HGD) asks the Court for leave to amend its original complaint. (Doc. 90). The Court denies HGDs motion to amend because the proposed amendment would be futile. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 12/16/2016. (KEK)
|September 29, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION - The Court grants in part and denies in part the motions to dismiss. The Court DENIES the motion to dismiss HGDs breach of contract claim against the Brindley Estate; DENIES the motion to dismiss HGDs fraud and deceit claim agains t the Brindley Estate; and DENIES the motions to dismiss the civil conspiracy to commit fraud and deceit claim against the Brindley Estate, Jeffery Brindley, and Whitney. The Court GRANTS the motions to dismiss all other claims brought by HGD and DISMISSES those claims WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 9/28/2015. (KEK)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?