Johnson v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.

Plaintiff: Chanda Johnson
Defendant: J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2013cv01088
Filed: June 7, 2013
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: C Lynwood Smith
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29:2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 31, 2015 77 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the plaintiff's 61 MOTION in Limine is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part and DENIED AS MOOT in part as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 3/31/2015. (AHI )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chanda Johnson
Represented By: Temple D Trueblood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Represented By: Haley Andrews Cox
Represented By: Catherine Kays
Represented By: William H Morrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?