Lee v. Thomas et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 11, 2016
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION AND PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER; REFERRING CASE BACK TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE; Plaintiff's 56 Objection to Report and Recommendations are OVERRULED. Shirley Brown terminated. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 3/11/2016. (JLC)
|March 3, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER; The Magistrate Judge's Report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and his Recommendation is ACCEPTED. The MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by defendants, Thomas, Culliver, Conway, and Bia s is GRANTED, and the claims against them are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of defendants Thomas, Culliver, Conway, and Bias. The Court EXPRESSLY FINDS the claims against defendant Deloach are DISMISSED for L ack of Prosecution. Defendant Estes's Objection to the inmate affidavits are OVERRULED, and defendant Estes's request for additional time to respond to the footnote statement is DENIED. Accordingly, defendant Estes's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and the claim against him is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings as set out herein. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 3/3/2016. (JLC)
|January 15, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER-re: Motions 12 , 13 , 14 & 16 . Pltf's motions for preliminary, emergency relief are DENIED. Pltf's motion to expedite 14 is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Robert B Propst on 1/15/2014. (AVC)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?