LaSalle 2006-MF4 1402-1406 Brookline Avenue LLC v. Thomas
Plaintiff: LaSalle 2006-MF4 1402-1406 Brookline Avenue LLC
Defendant: Marilyn J Thomas
Case Number: 5:2013cv01467
Filed: August 8, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Northeastern Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Inge P Johnson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Inge P Johnson on 3/10/14. (ASL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LaSalle 2006-MF4 1402-1406 Brookline Avenue LLC v. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LaSalle 2006-MF4 1402-1406 Brookline Avenue LLC
Represented By: Joshua F Reif
Represented By: Eric Lloyd Pruitt
Represented By: Marianne H Combs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marilyn J Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?