Lovingood v. Discovery Communications Inc et al
| Judson A Lovingood |
| Discovery Communications Inc, Science Channel, The, Discovery Channel, The, BBC Films, Open University, The and Kate Gartside |
| 5:2014cv00684 |
| April 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Northeastern Office |
| Madison |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the reasons discussed above, the Court GRANTS the Discovery defendants motion for summary judgment with respect to Dr. Lovingoods claims for defamation and false light invasion of privacy. (Doc. 62). The Court will enter a separate order consistent with this memorandum opinion. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 8/1/2017. (KEK)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the reasons stated above, the Court DENIES Discoverys motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. 6). The Court GRANTS BBCs motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (Doc. 14) and GRANTS Kate Gartsides motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (Doc. 32). The Court requests that the remaining parties please file a notice containing an amended proposed scheduling order. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 9/30/2015. (KEK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
