Phillips v. Hill et al
||Gary Alan Phillips, Jr
||Chris Hill and Jane C Smith
||September 17, 2015
||US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
||R David Proctor
||John H England
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 14, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/14/2018. (KAM, )
|June 1, 2017
ORDER adopting in part and overruling in part 9 Report and Recommendations; The court ADOPTS all portions of the Report except for the Magistrate Judges recommendation that Defendant Hill should be directed to answer the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 false arrest and false imprisonment claims in his official capacity; any § 1983 claims against Defendant Hill in his official capacity are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; Plaintiffs claim req uesting judicial institutional of criminal charges is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Jane C. Smith are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim. A ll of Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Hill, with the exception of his § 1983 individual-capacity false arrest and false imprisonment claims, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs individual-capacity false arrest and false imprisonment claims against Defendant Hill are REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 6/1/2017. (KAM, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?