Patel et al v. Shah et al
Jigar Patel, Palak Patel, Kanu Patel, Veena Patel, Payal Patel and Shreepal Patel |
Ashish Shah, Anthony Sharifi, Sharifi Inc and Eat Fresh Inc |
5:2015cv01959 |
October 30, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Northeastern Office |
Madison |
Madeline Hughes Haikala |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons explained above, the Court awards the plaintiffs costs in the amount of $888.06. The Court finds that the offers of judgment do not include fees, and under the FLSA, the plaintiffs are entitled to p ayment of reasonable fees. Within 45 days of entry of this order, the parties shall mediate their dispute concerning the amount of the fee award and submit their proposed resolution for Court approval. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 2/7/2018. (KEK) |
Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the reasons stated above, the Court approves the parties proposed resolution of the plaintiffs claims. The Court concludes that there is a bona fide dispute regarding the plaintiffs FLSA claims, and the terms that the parties have negotiated constitute a fair and reasonable resolution of that dispute. The Court will enter a separate order entering judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 5/23/2017. (KEK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.