Brown v. Express Scripts Holding Company

Plaintiff: Lonnie E. Brown
Defendant: Express Scripts Holding Company
Case Number: 5:2016cv00428
Filed: March 14, 2016
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Harwell G Davis
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 30, 2017 28 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER for reasons stated within the motion for summary judgment, 19 , is GRANTED; This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Costs taxed against Brown. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 06/30/2017. (KBB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Express Scripts Holding Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lonnie E. Brown
Represented By: George A Hartline, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Express Scripts Holding Company
Represented By: Brian P Kappel
Represented By: Matthew D Knepper
Represented By: Michael P Nolan
Represented By: Harlan Irby Prater, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?