Fidelity National Title Insurance Company v. Wooden et al
||Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
||Tracy C. Wooden, Kristi Wooden, Smartbank and Smartfinancial, Inc.
||May 23, 2016
||US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
||XX US, Outside State
||Harwell G Davis
|Nature of Suit:
||All Other Real Property
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 11, 2019
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER consistent with this opinion, Smartbank's motion 116 and the Woodens' motions for summary judgment, 114 , 115 , are DENIED. Fidelity's motion, 112 , is GRANTED solely as to the Woodens' bad faith claim. Accordingly, the Woodens' bad faith claim, Court III is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Fidelity's Motion to Strike the testimony of T. Boice Turner, Jr., 64 is MOOT in light of Smartbank's failure to use Turner's testimony in i ts motion for summary judgment. Pretrial Conference is RESCHEDULED for 1/29/2019 at 8:00 AM; Jury Trial on the remaining claims will proceed on 2/25/2019 at 9:00 AM; BOTH in the US Post Office & Courthouse, Decatur, AL before Judge Abdul K Kallon. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 1/11/2019. (AFS)
|May 23, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER GRANTING 31 Smartbank's motion to dismiss the claims against it as to Count III, which is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and DENIED as to Counts IV and V ; Smartbank's motion for extension of time to file its initial disclosures, 46 , is MOOT. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 05/23/2017. (KBB)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?