Copeny v. Kyle et al
Plaintiff: Marcus James Copeny
Defendant: Don Kyle, City of Decatur Alabama Police Department, Brian Prosser, Letson and Rutherford
Case Number: 5:2016cv00865
Filed: May 27, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Morgan
Presiding Judge: Karon O Bowdre
Presiding Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION - Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation and the plaintiffs objections, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judges report and ACCEPTS her recommenda tion as MODIFIED here. The court OVERRULES THE plaintiffs objections. Accordingly, the defendants motion for summary judgment is due to be granted, and all claims presented in the instant matter are due to be dismissed. A court will enter a separate Final Order. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 9/20/2018. (KEK)
September 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING and ACCEPTING AS MODIFIED the Magistrate Judge's 9 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that all claims against all defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), EXCEPT th e Fourth Amendment excessive force claims against defendants Prosser, Rutherford, and Letson in their individual capacities. The Court further ORDERS that the surviving claims are REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 9/5/2017. (JLC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Copeny v. Kyle et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcus James Copeny
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Don Kyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Decatur Alabama Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Prosser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Letson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rutherford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?