Sneed v. Dunn

Petitioner: Ulysses Charles Sneed
Respondent: Jefferson S Dunn
Miscellaneous: staff attorney 5
Case Number: 5:2016cv01442
Filed: August 31, 2016
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Escambia
Presiding Judge: Abdul K Kallon
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sneed v. Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ulysses Charles Sneed
Represented By: Rhonda Richardson Caviedes(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Mark S Hersh(Designation Retained)
Represented By: M David Short(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Christopher K Walters(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Jeffrey Whitt(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jefferson S Dunn
Represented By: Henry Mitchell Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Miscellaneous: staff attorney 5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?