Readus v. Roeck et al

Plaintiff: Seneka Castrell Readus
Defendant: HMR Vetran Services
Case Number: 5:2016cv02060
Filed: December 22, 2016
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: Abdul K Kallon
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 27, 2017 18 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 10 HMR's motion to Dismiss,is GRANTED as to the disparate treatment claim (Count I), and DENIED as to the retaliation claim (Count II), Count I is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Readus's motion for extension, [1 3], and HMR's motion to stay, 16 , are MOOT; the current motion for leave, 17 , is DENIED as futile; The parties are directed to file their Rule 26(f) report as directed in the Uniform Initial Order, doc. 12 at 12. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 06/27/2017. (KBB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Readus v. Roeck et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Seneka Castrell Readus
Represented By: Kimberly Adina Ford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HMR Vetran Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?