Readus v. Roeck et al
||Seneka Castrell Readus
||HMR Vetran Services
||December 22, 2016
||US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
||Abdul K Kallon
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 2000
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 27, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 10 HMR's motion to Dismiss,is GRANTED as to the disparate treatment claim (Count I), and DENIED as to the retaliation claim (Count II), Count I is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Readus's motion for extension, [1 3], and HMR's motion to stay, 16 , are MOOT; the current motion for leave, 17 , is DENIED as futile; The parties are directed to file their Rule 26(f) report as directed in the Uniform Initial Order, doc. 12 at 12. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 06/27/2017. (KBB)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?