Killough et al v. Monkress et al
| Doug Killough and Technical Consulting Solutions, Inc. |
| Phil Monkress and All Points Logistics, LLC |
| 5:2017cv00247 |
| February 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Northeastern Office |
| Madison |
| Harwell G Davis |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
251
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER-APL'S motion for attorneys' fees, 211 , and its bill of costs, 219 , are DENIED. Killough's and TCS's bill of costs, 213 , is GRANTED IN PART, and the court will tax costs of $23,132.55, plus a ny allowable costs as referenced in footnote 14, against APL under Rule 54(d) and § 1920. Killough and TCS are ORDERED to file invoices that properly delineate those allowable costs by June 1, 2022. Otherwise, the court will not tax those invoices. Killough's and TCS's motions to strike or to file a sur-reply, 231 , 238 are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 05/17/2022. (AKD)
|
|
Filing
115
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 03/30/2021. (AKD)
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 58 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaim as set out herein. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 1/17/2020. (JLC)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER the Partial Motion to Dismiss 42 is GRANTED as to the promissory fraud claim, and that claim is DISSMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The motion is DENIED as to the fraudulent suppression and fraudulent misrepresentation claims. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 4/17/2019. (AFS)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The motion to strike 23 is GRANTED solely as to the claim for attorneys' fees. The court GRANTS APL's motion to dismiss 22 with respect to the fraud claims, Counts II-V, the claim for tortious interference, Count IX, and the negligence claim, Count X. Except for those claims where the court has specifically found that repleading would be futile, TCS may replead the dismissed claims. Finally, the court ORDERS TCS, in its amended complaint which is due by August 15, 2018, to file a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e) with respect to all surviving claims. In all other respects, APL's motion, 22 , is DENIED. In light of this ruling, the stay issued on May 11, 2017, 31 , is LIFTED. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 8/1/2018. (AFS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
