Hayden v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Northern District Hayden v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

Hayden v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

Plaintiff:	Thomas Charles Hayden
Defendant:	Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Case Number:	5:2017cv00881
Filed:	May 30, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office:	Northeastern Office
County:	Madison
Presiding Judge:	Staci G Cornelius
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 11, 2019	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION - The magistrate judge to whom this case initially was assigned entered a report in which she recommended that the Court reverse and remand the Commissioners decision denying Mr. Haydens disability claim. (Doc. 11 , p. 7). The mag istrate judge advised the parties of their right to file objections within 14 days. (Doc. 11 , pp. 7-8). To date, no party has filed objections to the magistrate judges report and recommendation. The Court finds no misstatements of law in the report and no plain error in the magistrate judges description of the relevant facts. Therefore, the Court adopts the magistrate judges report and accepts her recommendation.The Court will issue a separate final judgment consistent with this memorandum opinion. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 3/11/2019. (KEK)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 11, 2019

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION - The magistrate judge to whom this case initially was assigned entered a report in which she recommended that the Court reverse and remand the Commissioners decision denying Mr. Haydens disability claim. (Doc. 11 , p. 7). The mag istrate judge advised the parties of their right to file objections within 14 days. (Doc. 11 , pp. 7-8). To date, no party has filed objections to the magistrate judges report and recommendation. The Court finds no misstatements of law in the report and no plain error in the magistrate judges description of the relevant facts. Therefore, the Court adopts the magistrate judges report and accepts her recommendation.The Court will issue a separate final judgment consistent with this memorandum opinion. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 3/11/2019. (KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hayden v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Charles Hayden
Represented By:	Kenneth D Hampton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?