Allen v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
| William Allen |
| Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. |
| 5:2018cv01309 |
| August 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Northeastern Office |
| Madison |
| Herman N Johnson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER notifying the parties that, unless they unanimously consent to the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge by no later than November 8, 2018, the case will be reassigned to a randomly-drawn district judge for all purposes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 9/25/2018. (BJL)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER setting telephone status conference for 10/30/2018 at 09:30 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 9/25/2018. (BJL)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26 as more fully set out therein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 9/25/2018. (BJL)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Par Pharmaceutical, Inc..(Phillips, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.. filed by Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Phillips, Matthew) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.'s answer or response pleading due 9/24/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 9/10/18. (LMC, )
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (Unopposed) Motion is RIPE 9/10/2018. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.. (Phillips, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Allen. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. served on 8/20/2018, answer due 9/10/2018. (Wrady, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. by Clerk and delivered to Plaintiff for service. (SPT ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Assignment of Case to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial. (SPT ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. filed by William Allen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(SPT ) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3153629 (B4601091367). related document #1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. filed by William Allen. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(SPT ). (Wrady, Joshua) Modified on 8/17/2018 (SPT ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Allen v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Allen | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Aaron Wrady |
| Represented By: | Anthony David Michel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Tae Phillips |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
