Moore v. MidFirst Bank

Case Number:	5:2018cv01414
Filed:	February 11, 2019
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office:	Northeastern Office
Nature of Suit:	Bankruptcy Withdrawl
Cause of Action:	11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 30, 2019	Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE that pursuant to the joint stipulation of dismissal; it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 12/30/2019. (AHI)
February 11, 2019	Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - This case is before the Court on MidFirst Banks motion to withdraw the general order of reference pertaining to an adversary proceeding that Sendrella Moore filed against MidFirst in bankruptcy court. (Doc. 1 ). The C ourt grants MidFirsts motion to withdraw the general order of reference with respect to Ms. Moores adversary proceeding because MidFirst has shown good cause for doing so. Also pending before the Court is the parties joint motion to consolidate. (Doc. 8 ). Because Moore is not the first case filed among the cases that the parties wish to consolidate, the Court may not decide the motion to consolidate in this case. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 2/8/2019. (KEK)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 30, 2019

Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE that pursuant to the joint stipulation of dismissal; it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 12/30/2019. (AHI)

February 11, 2019

Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - This case is before the Court on MidFirst Banks motion to withdraw the general order of reference pertaining to an adversary proceeding that Sendrella Moore filed against MidFirst in bankruptcy court. (Doc. 1 ). The C ourt grants MidFirsts motion to withdraw the general order of reference with respect to Ms. Moores adversary proceeding because MidFirst has shown good cause for doing so. Also pending before the Court is the parties joint motion to consolidate. (Doc. 8 ). Because Moore is not the first case filed among the cases that the parties wish to consolidate, the Court may not decide the motion to consolidate in this case. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 2/8/2019. (KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. MidFirst Bank
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?