Dahlan v. Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC et al
Plaintiff: Nader Dahlan
Defendant: Par Pharmaceutical Inc and Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC
Case Number: 5:2018cv01504
Filed: September 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Liles C Burke
Referring Judge: Abdul K Kallon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 10/26/2018. (AHI)
October 17, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL - This case is being reassigned from Judge Kallon to Judge Liles Burke. Please use case number 5:18-CV-1504-LCB on all subsequent pleadings (AHI)
October 16, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Morgan Pike Epperson on behalf of All Defendants (Epperson, Morgan)
October 11, 2018 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Par Pharmaceutical Inc, Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC. filed by Par Pharmaceutical Inc, Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC (Phillips, Matthew)
October 11, 2018 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Par Pharmaceutical Inc, Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC.(Phillips, Matthew)
September 24, 2018 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Par Pharmaceutical Inc served on 9/20/2018, answer due 10/11/2018; Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC served on 9/20/2018, answer due 10/11/2018. (AHI)
September 17, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Issued by the clerk and delivered via certified mail for service as to Par Pharmaceutical Inc and Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC. (AHI)
September 17, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL regarding case assigned to unassigned judge; this case has been referred to Judge Kallon until further notice. Please use case number 5:18-CV-1504-UJH-AKK on all subsequent pleadings (AHI)
September 14, 2018 Filing 3 Request for service by certified mail for Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC filed by Nader Dahlan. (AHI)
September 14, 2018 Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail for Par Pharmaceutical Inc. filed by Nader Dahlan. (AHI)
September 14, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand thereon against Par Pharmaceutical Inc and Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC (Filing fee $ 400; receipt number: B4601092043) filed by Nader Dahlan.(AHI )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dahlan v. Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nader Dahlan
Represented By: Dustin J Kittle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Par Pharmaceutical Inc
Represented By: Matthew Tae Phillips
Represented By: Morgan Pike Epperson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC
Represented By: Matthew Tae Phillips
Represented By: Morgan Pike Epperson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?