Francis v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. et al
Isom Francis |
Celadon Group, Inc., Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. and Lonis Shawn Monroe |
5:2018cv01769 |
October 25, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Madeline Hughes Haikala |
Herman N Johnson |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 12/13/2018. (KEK) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT: The parties having not unanimously consented to the dispositive jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, this civil action has been randomly reassigned to the Honorable Madeline Hughes Haikala. Please use case number 5:18-cv-1769-MHH on all subsequent pleadings. (BJL) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Celadon Group, Inc., Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.. filed by Celadon Group, Inc., Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. (Richmond, Lea) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Celadon Group, Inc., Celadon Trucking Services, Inc..(Richmond, Lea) |
Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number B4601093060 (BJL) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial. (BJL) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Celadon Group, Inc. and Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. from Circuit Court of Morgan County, Alabama, case number 52-CV-2018-900470. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(BJL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.