Rose v. Blakely, et al
| Jason Ray Rose |
| Sidney Townsand, Mike Blakely, Vanessa Rich, Tammy Waddell, Jackie McNatt and Roy Brooks |
| 5:2019cv00123 |
| January 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John E Ott |
| R David Proctor |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42:1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER that the court having received prisoner consent form the Warden is directed to deduct Monthly Payments from Prison Account of Jason Ray Rose. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/18/2019. (KAM)
|
| Filing 5 PRISONER CONSENT FORM filed by Jason Ray Rose. (KEK) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER that that the plaintiff must signed and return the Prisoner Consent Form within 15 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 3/5/2019. (KAM)
|
| Initial Partial Filing fee: $ 6.80, receipt number B4601095218 (KAM) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay a partial filing fee of $6.80, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 1/23/2019. (KAM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jason Ray Rose. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mike Blakely, Roy Brooks, Jackie McNatt, Vanessa Rich, Sidney Townsand, Tammy Waddell, filed by Jason Ray Rose.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
