Naravaez v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
| Evelyn Naravaez |
| Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. |
| 5:2019cv00576 |
| April 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Herman N Johnson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0151 ta |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: the parties are hereby notified that, unless they unanimously consent to the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge by no later than August 15, 2019, the case will be reassigned to a randomly-drawn district judge for all purposes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 7/2/19. (BJL)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER setting Telephone Conference for 7/31/2019 at 09:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 7/2/19. (BJL)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26 as more fully set out therein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 7/2/19. (BJL)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Capital One Bank (USA), N.A..(Miller, Zachary) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.. filed by Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (Miller, Zachary) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall file its answer or other response to Plaintiff's complaint by July 1, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 5/30/19. (LBG, )
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaitniff's Complaint Motion is RIPE 5/30/2019. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.. (Miller, Zachary) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Evelyn Naravaez. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. served on 5/9/2019, answer due 5/30/2019. (Blacksher, Wesley) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. by Clerk and delivered to Plaintiff for service. (BJL) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3326824 (receipt number B4601096927). related document #1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. filed by Evelyn Naravaez.(BJL). (Blacksher, Wesley) Modified on 4/19/2019 (BJL). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial. (BJL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. filed by Evelyn Naravaez.(BJL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Naravaez v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Zachary D Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Evelyn Naravaez | |
| Represented By: | Wesley Haas Blacksher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
